Threat to our Faith Webinar

A faith-in-jeopardy webinar was organized by the GKSA Deputies for Government Affairs after the CRL chairperson made statements such as:

  • We are going to set up a section 22 committee… who will help us push through legislation in parliament. It’s not business as usual around churches anymore
  • The government lost control of the religious sector after 1994… and this must stop

A letter was also sent to the Reformed Churches.

Webinar lectures:

  • Opening | Ds Pieter le Roux | Youtube
  • Historical Reactions to State Intervention | Prof Andries Raath | Youtube | PDF
  • CRL danger | Adv Pieter Aucamp | Youtube | PDF
  • The State as God’s servant | Prof Francois Muller | Youtube | PDF
  • What can/should be done | Ds Tommie van Vuuren | Youtube | PDF
  • Questions & Answers | Youtube

Letter to the Churches:

The Deputies for Government Affairs of the GKSA hereby wish to inform you of important developments regarding the current process of the CRL (Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities) concerning religion in South Africa.

1. Background to the matter
The CRL is currently conducting a so-called “Section 22 process,” which is presented as an open and voluntary consultation with churches and faith communities regarding self-regulation and accountability within the religious sector.

2. Actual direction of the process
Recent public statements by the Chairperson of the CRL clearly indicate that the intention extends beyond mere consultation. There is open discussion of:

  • the establishment of a statutory council for religion, and 
  • the adoption of legislation by Parliament to establish such a council. 

This means that the process is not merely aimed at voluntary cooperation, but could potentially lead to state control over the religious sector.

3. Implications for churches
According to proposals currently under discussion, the following may be introduced:

  • Registration of churches and religious leaders 
  • A binding code of conduct 
  • A “certificate of good standing” for compliant institutions 
  • Sanctions for non-compliance, including deregistration 

These elements point to a compulsory regulatory framework, rather than mere self-regulation.

4. Core concern
The core concern is not opposition to accountability or ethical conduct. On the contrary:

  • The church acknowledges the necessity of addressing abuse and wrongdoing. 
  • There is already sufficient legislation in South Africa to deal with unlawful conduct. 

The concern is that the proposed framework:

  • gives the state a role in determining religious ethics and practice, and 
  • may infringe upon the constitutional right to freedom of religion. 

5. Current status
There are currently legal proceedings underway that challenge the lawfulness of this process. The outcome of these cases may have a significant impact on any further developments.

6. Our involvement as Deputies
The Deputies for Government Affairs of the GKSA are taking this matter seriously and are closely monitoring developments. We are also studying the situation carefully and will provide guidance where necessary.

7. Future communication and involvement
We plan to host a webinar within the next few months in which:

  • more comprehensive information will be provided, and 
  • the importance of the involvement of our churches in this matter will be addressed. 

Further details will be communicated in due course.

Conclusion
We request that church councils and members take note of this matter and bring it before the Lord in prayer. This concerns the freedom of the church to serve the Lord according to His Word.

Brotherly greetings,
Deputies for Government Affairs – GKSA

NB: Permission granted to FOR SA for the use of information regarding the above matter.

Geloofsgevaar webinaar

‘n Geloofsgevaar webinaar is gereël deur die GKSA Deputate Owerheidsake nadat die CRL voorsitter uitsprake gemaak het soos:

  • We are going to set up a section 22 committee… who will help us push through legislation in parliament. It’s not business as usual around churches anymore
  • The government lost control of the religious sector after 1994… and this must stop

Daar is óók ‘n brief geskryf aan die GKSA kerke. Onder is die brief wat gestuur is en die skakels na hierdie webinaar:

Webinaar lesings:

  • Opening | Ds Pieter le Roux | Youtube
  • Historical Reactions to State Intervention | Prof Andries Raath | Youtube | PDF
  • CRL gevaar | Adv Pieter Aucamp | Youtube | PDF
  • Die Owerheid as God se Dienaar | Prof Francois Muller | Youtube | PDF
  • Wat kan/moet gedoen word | Ds Tommie van Vuuren | Youtube | PDF
  • Vrae & Antwoorde | Youtube

Hier is die brief aan die kerke:

Die Deputate Owerheid van die GKSA wil u hiermee inlig oor belangrike ontwikkelinge rakende die CRL (Kommissie vir die Bevordering en Beskerming van die Regte van Kultuur-, Godsdiens- en Taalgemeenskappe) se huidige proses met betrekking tot godsdiens in Suid-Afrika.

1. Agtergrond van die saak
Die CRL het tans ’n sogenaamde “Artikel 22-proses” aan die gang, wat voorgehou word as ’n oop en vrywillige konsultasie met kerke en geloofsgemeenskappe oor selfregulering en aanspreeklikheid binne die godsdienssektor.

2. Werklike rigting van die proses
Onlangse openbare verklarings deur die voorsitter van die CRL dui egter duidelik daarop dat die bedoeling verder strek as bloot konsultasie. Daar word openlik gepraat van:

  • die instelling van ’n statutêre raad vir godsdiens, en 
  • die aanvaarding van wetgewing deur die Parlement om sodanige raad te vestig. 

Dit beteken dat die proses nie bloot vrywillige samewerking beoog nie, maar moontlik kan lei tot staatbeheer oor die godsdienssektor.

3. Implikasies vir kerke
Volgens die voorstelle wat tans bespreek word, kan die volgende ingestel word:

  • Registrasie van kerke en geestelike leiers 
  • ’n Bindende gedragskode 
  • ’n “Sertifikaat van goeie status” vir nakomende instellings 
  • Sanksies vir nie-nakoming, insluitend deregistrasie 

Hierdie elemente dui op ’n verpligte reguleringsraamwerk, en nie blote selfregulering nie.

4. Kernbeswaar
Die kern van die beswaar is nie teen aanspreeklikheid of etiese optrede nie. Inteendeel:

  • Die kerk erken die noodsaak om misbruik en onreg aan te spreek. 
  • Daar bestaan reeds voldoende wetgewing in Suid-Afrika om onwettige optrede te hanteer. 

Die beswaar is dat die voorgestelde raamwerk:

  • die staat ’n rol gee om oor godsdiens-etiek en praktyk te besluit, en 
  • moontlik die grondwetlike reg op godsdiensvryheid kan aantas. 

5. Huidige stand van sake
Daar is tans ook regsgedinge aanhangig wat die wettigheid van hierdie proses bevraagteken. Die uitkoms daarvan kan ’n wesenlike invloed hê op enige verdere ontwikkelinge.

6. Ons betrokkenheid as Deputate
Die Deputate Owerheid van die GKSA is ernstig besig met hierdie saak en volg die ontwikkelinge noukeurig. Ons is ook besig om die situasie deeglik te bestudeer en sal, waar nodig, leiding gee.

7. Toekomstige kommunikasie en betrokkenheid
Ons beplan om binne die volgende paar maande ’n webinaar aan te bied waarin:

  • meer volledige toeligting gegee sal word, en 
  • oor die belangrikheid van ons kerke se betrokkenheid oor hierdie saak. 

Verdere besonderhede sal betyds gekommunikeer word.

Slot
Ons versoek dat kerkrade en lidmate hiervan kennis neem en die saak in gebed aan die Here opdra. Dit raak die vryheid van die kerk om die Here volgens sy Woord te dien.

Broederlike groete
Deputate Owerheid – GKSA

NS. Vergunning aan FORSA vir die inligting oor bg. saak.